Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Nolan vs Steven De Waard Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nolan vs Waard analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Nolan vs Steven De Waard Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nolan 2 - 0 Waard
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nolan has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Waard has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nolan, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Waard has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nolan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Waard has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nolan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Waard winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nolan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 64/ 60), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 9/ 19). Waard has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 41/ 42).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nolan winning 2 times and Waard being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Nolan winning 4 and Waard winning 0. The last match between Nolan and Waard was at the Canberra Challenger, 02-11-2016, Second, Hard with Daniel Nolan getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:19.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nolan and Waard have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nolan winning 0 times and Waard 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nolan winning 1, and Waard 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nolan has played against opponents with an average rank of while Waard has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nolan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Waard has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nolan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Waard has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
606
High
27
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
707
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
47% (74-82)
Career Total W/L
51% (66-64)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniel Nolan vs Steven De Waard For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nolan VS Waard
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Daniel Nolan | Steven De Waard |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:19 | 1:21:19 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (92/129) | 68% (79/117) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (64/92) | 63% (50/79) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (22/37) | 42% (16/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (51/117) | 33% (43/129) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Nolan
Player
Steven De Waard
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 7-6(0) 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Steven De Waard
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Nolan | Steven De Waard |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Nolan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Michael Look
Player
Daniel Nolan
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Nitin Kumar Sinha
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Mohit Mayur Jayaprakash
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Soichiro Moritani
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Look
Player
Daniel Nolan
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
55%
(
16 of
29)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
37
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maverick Banes
Player
Daniel Nolan
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
80%
(
32 of
40)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Alec Adamson
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Blake Ellis
65%
(
81 of
125)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
1
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
36%
(
16 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
103
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Calum Puttergill
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
11
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Takuto Niki
Player
Daniel Nolan
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Steven De Waard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Steven De Waard
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
93)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Ruben Mccormack
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Bourchier
Player
Steven De Waard
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
8
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
39 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harry Bourchier
Player
Steven De Waard
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
6
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
8
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
James Frawley
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Steven De Waard
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Steven De Waard
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Thomas Fancutt
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Nolan Vs Waard Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nolan are available here and Waard photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
